Congo vs Estonia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Congo
96.9%
in 2025
Estonia
97.7%
in 2025
Congo rank
10th
Estonia rank
9th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Congo
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 97.7% against 96.9% in Congo, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 10th and Estonia ranks 9th of 177 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.9% | 71.0% | 19.1% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 59.3% | 97.6% | 38.4% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 85.2% | 97.7% | 12.4% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Congo or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 97.7% against 96.9% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Congo and Estonia?
- 0.8%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Congo ranks 10th and Estonia ranks 9th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.