Ecuador vs Kenya: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Ecuador
50.7%
in 2025
Kenya
50.1%
in 2025
Ecuador rank
85th
Kenya rank
88th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Ecuador
- Kenya
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 50.7% against 50.1% in Kenya, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.
Ecuador ranks 85th and Kenya ranks 88th of 177 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.1% | 40.7% | 23.6% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 28.7% | 48.2% | 19.5% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 45.8% | 50.1% | 4.3% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Ecuador or Kenya?
- Ecuador, at 50.7% against 50.1% in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Ecuador and Kenya?
- 0.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Ecuador ranks 85th and Kenya ranks 88th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.