Estonia vs Northern Africa: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Estonia
97.7%
in 2025
Northern Africa
45.2%
in 2025
Estonia rank
11th
Northern Africa rank
5th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Estonia
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 97.7% against 45.2% in Northern Africa, a difference of 52.5%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 2.2 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 11th and Northern Africa ranks 5th of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.0% | 27.1% | 43.8% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 97.6% | 39.7% | 57.9% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 97.7% | 44.6% | 53.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Estonia or Northern Africa?
- Estonia, at 97.7% against 45.2% in Northern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Estonia and Northern Africa?
- 52.5%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Northern Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Northern Africa rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Estonia ranks 11th and Northern Africa ranks 5th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.