Falkland Islands (Malvinas) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by

Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
18.3%
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
22.3%
in 2025
Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rank
154th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
150th

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time

  • Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
05101520200020122025

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 22.3% against 18.3% in Falkland Islands (Malvinas), a difference of 4.0%.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Falkland Islands (Malvinas)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 154th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 150th of 201 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 17.8% 22.3% 4.6% Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 18.3% 22.3% 4.0% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 18.3% 22.3% 4.0% Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Falkland Islands (Malvinas) or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 22.3% against 18.3% in Falkland Islands (Malvinas) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
4.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 154th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/falkland-islands-malvinas/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/falkland-islands-malvinas/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Falkland Islands (Malvinas) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
223 places, 5,798 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed