Fiji vs Iceland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Fiji
16.5%
in 2025
Iceland
16.1%
in 2025
Fiji rank
141st
Iceland rank
142nd
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Fiji
- Iceland
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 16.5% against 16.1% in Iceland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Fiji ranks 141st and Iceland ranks 142nd of 177 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.5% | 10.2% | 0.4% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 16.5% | 14.1% | 2.5% | Fiji |
| 2020s | 16.5% | 15.9% | 0.7% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Fiji or Iceland?
- Fiji, at 16.5% against 16.1% in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Fiji and Iceland?
- 0.4%, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Iceland rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Fiji ranks 141st and Iceland ranks 142nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.