Georgia vs Kiribati: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Georgia
36.3%
in 2025
Kiribati
32.9%
in 2025
Georgia rank
112th
Kiribati rank
115th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Georgia
- Kiribati
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 36.3% against 32.9% in Kiribati, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 112th and Kiribati ranks 115th of 177 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.3% | 13.2% | 23.1% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 36.3% | 32.9% | 3.4% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 36.3% | 32.9% | 3.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Georgia or Kiribati?
- Georgia, at 36.3% against 32.9% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Georgia and Kiribati?
- 3.4%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kiribati?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Kiribati rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Georgia ranks 112th and Kiribati ranks 115th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.