Gibraltar vs Saudi Arabia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Gibraltar
32.2%
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
30.7%
in 2025
Gibraltar rank
117th
Saudi Arabia rank
120th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Gibraltar
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 32.2% against 30.7% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 117th and Saudi Arabia ranks 120th of 177 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.9% | 25.8% | 3.1% | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 32.2% | 25.8% | 6.4% | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 32.2% | 28.2% | 3.9% | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Gibraltar or Saudi Arabia?
- Gibraltar, at 32.2% against 30.7% in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Gibraltar and Saudi Arabia?
- 1.5%, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Saudi Arabia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Gibraltar and Saudi Arabia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Gibraltar ranks 117th and Saudi Arabia ranks 120th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.