Greenland vs Grenada: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
Grenada
30.2%
in 2025
Greenland rank
126th
Grenada rank
123rd
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Greenland
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 126th and Grenada ranks 123rd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.2% | 0.1% | 26.1% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 29.2% | 24.2% | 5.1% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 29.6% | 30.2% | 0.6% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Greenland or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Greenland and Grenada?
- 0.6%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Grenada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Greenland and Grenada rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Greenland ranks 126th and Grenada ranks 123rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.