Guinea-Bissau vs Kenya: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Guinea-Bissau
50.7%
in 2025
Kenya
50.1%
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
93rd
Kenya rank
95th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Kenya
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 50.7% against 50.1% in Kenya, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Kenya ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.0% | 40.7% | 8.7% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 44.5% | 48.2% | 3.7% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 50.7% | 50.1% | 0.6% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Guinea-Bissau or Kenya?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 50.7% against 50.1% in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Guinea-Bissau and Kenya?
- 0.6%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kenya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Kenya rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Kenya ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.