Iceland vs Israel: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Iceland
16.1%
in 2025
Israel
15.1%
in 2025
Iceland rank
142nd
Israel rank
143rd
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Iceland
- Israel
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 16.1% against 15.1% in Israel, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 142nd and Israel ranks 143rd of 177 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 10.1% | 0.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 14.1% | 13.8% | 0.2% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 15.9% | 15.1% | 0.8% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Iceland or Israel?
- Iceland, at 16.1% against 15.1% in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Iceland and Israel?
- 1.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Israel?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Israel rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Iceland ranks 142nd and Israel ranks 143rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.