Kenya vs Sudan: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Kenya
50.1%
in 2025
Sudan
48.0%
in 2025
Kenya rank
88th
Sudan rank
91st
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Kenya
- Sudan
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 50.1% against 48.0% in Sudan, a difference of 2.1%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 88th and Sudan ranks 91st of 177 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.7% | 0.0% | 40.7% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 19.2% | 29.0% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 50.1% | 48.0% | 2.1% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Kenya or Sudan?
- Kenya, at 50.1% against 48.0% in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Kenya and Sudan?
- 2.1%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Sudan rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Kenya ranks 88th and Sudan ranks 91st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.