Kenya vs United Arab Emirates: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Kenya
50.1%
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
48.3%
in 2025
Kenya rank
95th
United Arab Emirates rank
97th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Kenya
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 50.1% against 48.3% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 1.8%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 95th and United Arab Emirates ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.7% | 26.6% | 14.1% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 42.9% | 5.3% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 50.1% | 48.3% | 1.8% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Kenya or United Arab Emirates?
- Kenya, at 50.1% against 48.3% in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Kenya and United Arab Emirates?
- 1.8%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and United Arab Emirates?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and United Arab Emirates rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Kenya ranks 95th and United Arab Emirates ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.