Latvia vs Liberia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Latvia
96.1%
in 2025
Liberia
96.7%
in 2025
Latvia rank
14th
Liberia rank
13th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Latvia
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 96.7% against 96.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 14th and Liberia ranks 13th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.9% | 67.7% | 2.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 96.1% | 96.7% | 0.5% | Liberia |
| 2020s | 96.1% | 96.7% | 0.5% | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Latvia or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 96.7% against 96.1% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Latvia and Liberia?
- 0.6%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Liberia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Liberia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Latvia ranks 14th and Liberia ranks 13th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.