Latvia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Latvia
96.1%
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
92.3%
in 2025
Latvia rank
16th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
19th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Latvia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 96.1% against 92.3% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 3.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 16th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.9% | 36.9% | 33.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 96.1% | 92.3% | 3.8% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.1% | 92.3% | 3.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Latvia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Latvia, at 96.1% against 92.3% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Latvia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 3.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Latvia ranks 16th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.