Latvia vs Southern Asia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Latvia
96.1%
in 2025
Southern Asia
30.3%
in 2025
Latvia rank
16th
Southern Asia rank
17th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Latvia
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 96.1% against 30.3% in Southern Asia, a difference of 65.8%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 3.2 times Southern Asia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 16th and Southern Asia ranks 17th of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.9% | 25.9% | 44.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 96.1% | 27.7% | 68.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.1% | 29.8% | 66.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Latvia or Southern Asia?
- Latvia, at 96.1% against 30.3% in Southern Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Latvia and Southern Asia?
- 65.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Southern Asia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Southern Asia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Latvia ranks 16th and Southern Asia ranks 17th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.