Lithuania vs Namibia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Lithuania
83.4%
in 2025
Namibia
83.0%
in 2025
Lithuania rank
30th
Namibia rank
33rd
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Lithuania
- Namibia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 83.4% against 83.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 33rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.1% | 28.1% | 39.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 78.0% | 83.0% | 4.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 83.4% | 83.0% | 0.5% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Lithuania or Namibia?
- Lithuania, at 83.4% against 83.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Lithuania and Namibia?
- 0.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Lithuania ranks 30th and Namibia ranks 33rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.