New Zealand vs Sudan: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
New Zealand
47.2%
in 2025
Sudan
48.0%
in 2025
New Zealand rank
102nd
Sudan rank
98th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- New Zealand
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 48.0% against 47.2% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 102nd and Sudan ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.8% | 0.0% | 44.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 46.8% | 19.2% | 27.6% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 47.2% | 48.0% | 0.8% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, New Zealand or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 48.0% against 47.2% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between New Zealand and Sudan?
- 0.8%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Sudan rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- New Zealand ranks 102nd and Sudan ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.