Norway vs Pitcairn: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Norway
55.1%
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.2%
in 2025
Norway rank
73rd
Pitcairn rank
71st
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Norway
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 57.2% against 55.1% in Norway, a difference of 2.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 73rd and Pitcairn ranks 71st of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.4% | 16.3% | 30.1% | Norway |
| 2010s | 53.4% | 32.7% | 20.7% | Norway |
| 2020s | 55.1% | 57.2% | 2.0% | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Norway or Pitcairn?
- Pitcairn, at 57.2% against 55.1% in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Norway and Pitcairn?
- 2.1%, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Pitcairn rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Norway ranks 73rd and Pitcairn ranks 71st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.