Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Poland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
24.9%
in 2025
Poland
90.1%
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
20th
Poland rank
22nd

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Poland
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 90.1% against 24.9% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 65.2%.

That makes Poland's figure about 3.6 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 20th and Poland ranks 22nd of 22 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 10.3% 55.1% 44.8% Poland
2010s 21.3% 90.1% 68.8% Poland
2020s 24.5% 90.1% 65.7% Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Poland?
Poland, at 90.1% against 24.9% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Poland?
65.2%, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Poland rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 20th and Poland ranks 22nd of 22 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Poland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/poland/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Poland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
223 places, 5,798 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed