Pitcairn vs Saint Helena: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Pitcairn
57.2%
in 2025
Saint Helena
54.8%
in 2025
Pitcairn rank
71st
Saint Helena rank
74th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Pitcairn
- Saint Helena
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 57.2% against 54.8% in Saint Helena, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Helena ahead.
Pitcairn ranks 71st and Saint Helena ranks 74th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pitcairn averaged higher in 1 and Saint Helena in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 20.0% | 3.7% | Saint Helena |
| 2010s | 32.7% | 39.9% | 7.3% | Saint Helena |
| 2020s | 57.2% | 54.8% | 2.4% | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Pitcairn or Saint Helena?
- Pitcairn, at 57.2% against 54.8% in Saint Helena as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Pitcairn and Saint Helena?
- 2.4%, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Saint Helena?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Pitcairn and Saint Helena rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Pitcairn ranks 71st and Saint Helena ranks 74th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.