Pitcairn vs Sri Lanka: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Pitcairn
57.2%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
58.0%
in 2025
Pitcairn rank
71st
Sri Lanka rank
69th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Pitcairn
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 58.0% against 57.2% in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Pitcairn ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 47.5% | 31.2% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 32.7% | 56.5% | 23.8% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 57.2% | 58.0% | 0.9% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Pitcairn or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 58.0% against 57.2% in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Pitcairn and Sri Lanka?
- 0.8%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Pitcairn and Sri Lanka rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Pitcairn ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.