Samoa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Samoa
54.2%
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
54.0%
in 2025
Samoa rank
83rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
84th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Samoa
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 54.2% against 54.0% in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 83rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 84th of 201 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.2% | 50.3% | 3.8% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 54.2% | 54.0% | 0.1% | Samoa |
| 2020s | 54.2% | 54.0% | 0.1% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Samoa or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Samoa, at 54.2% against 54.0% in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Samoa and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Samoa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Samoa ranks 83rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 84th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.