Angola vs China: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Angola
9.8%
in 2025
China
12.2%
in 2025
Angola rank
147th
China rank
144th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Angola
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 12.2% against 9.8% in Angola, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 147th and China ranks 144th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.8% | 7.2% | 2.5% | Angola |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 11.1% | 1.3% | China |
| 2020s | 9.8% | 12.1% | 2.3% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Angola or China?
- China, at 12.2% against 9.8% in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Angola and China?
- 2.4%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and China?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Angola and China rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Angola ranks 147th and China ranks 144th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.