Australia and New Zealand vs Cabo Verde: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Australia and New Zealand
52.6%
in 2025
Cabo Verde
54.8%
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
89th
Cabo Verde rank
86th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 54.8% against 52.6% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 89th and Cabo Verde ranks 86th of 195 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.1% | 38.4% | 3.2% | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 44.2% | 54.8% | 10.6% | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 52.1% | 54.8% | 2.7% | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Australia and New Zealand or Cabo Verde?
- Cabo Verde, at 54.8% against 52.6% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Australia and New Zealand and Cabo Verde?
- 2.2%, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cabo Verde?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Cabo Verde rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 89th and Cabo Verde ranks 86th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.