Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Australia and New Zealand
52.6%
in 2025
Timor-Leste
50.8%
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
89th
Timor-Leste rank
91st

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Timor-Leste
1020304050200020122025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 52.6% against 50.8% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 1.8%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 89th and Timor-Leste ranks 91st of 195 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 35.1% 21.7% 13.4% Australia and New Zealand
2010s 44.2% 47.6% 3.4% Timor-Leste
2020s 52.1% 50.8% 1.3% Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Australia and New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
Australia and New Zealand, at 52.6% against 50.8% in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
1.8%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 89th and Timor-Leste ranks 91st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed