Belgium vs Eswatini: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Belgium
25.5%
in 2025
Eswatini
22.7%
in 2025
Belgium rank
129th
Eswatini rank
132nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Belgium
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 25.5% against 22.7% in Eswatini, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belgium ranks 129th and Eswatini ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.2% | 20.9% | 15.7% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 21.1% | 6.8% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 25.1% | 22.7% | 2.5% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Belgium or Eswatini?
- Belgium, at 25.5% against 22.7% in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Belgium and Eswatini?
- 2.8%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Belgium ranks 129th and Eswatini ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.