Belgium vs New Caledonia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Belgium
25.5%
in 2025
New Caledonia
26.3%
in 2025
Belgium rank
129th
New Caledonia rank
127th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Belgium
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 26.3% against 25.5% in Belgium, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Belgium ranks 129th and New Caledonia ranks 127th of 167 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.2% | 7.0% | 1.8% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 18.2% | 3.9% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 25.1% | 26.3% | 1.1% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Belgium or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 26.3% against 25.5% in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 0.8%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and New Caledonia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Belgium ranks 129th and New Caledonia ranks 127th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.