Belize vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Belize
87.1%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Belize rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Belize
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.5% against 87.1% in Belize, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.8% | 85.9% | 0.9% | Belize |
| 2010s | 87.1% | 87.5% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 87.1% | 87.5% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Belize or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.5% against 87.1% in Belize as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Belize and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belize and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Belize ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.