Burkina Faso vs Malawi: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Burkina Faso
63.0%
in 2025
Malawi
63.4%
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
73rd
Malawi rank
71st
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Burkina Faso
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 63.4% against 63.0% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 73rd and Malawi ranks 71st of 195 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.0% | 63.4% | 0.5% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 63.0% | 63.4% | 0.5% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 63.0% | 63.4% | 0.5% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Burkina Faso or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 63.4% against 63.0% in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 0.4%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Burkina Faso and Malawi rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Burkina Faso ranks 73rd and Malawi ranks 71st of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.