Cambodia vs Finland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Cambodia
93.8%
in 2025
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Cambodia rank
14th
Finland rank
12th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Cambodia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 93.8% in Cambodia, a difference of 3.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 14th and Finland ranks 12th of 167 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.8% | 90.3% | 29.5% | Finland |
| 2010s | 73.7% | 96.9% | 23.2% | Finland |
| 2020s | 93.8% | 97.0% | 3.1% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Cambodia or Finland?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 93.8% in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Cambodia and Finland?
- 3.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Finland rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Cambodia ranks 14th and Finland ranks 12th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.