Canada vs Congo: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Canada
43.7%
in 2025
Congo
45.0%
in 2025
Canada rank
91st
Congo rank
89th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Canada
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 45.0% against 43.7% in Canada, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 91st and Congo ranks 89th of 163 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.1% | 0.0% | 32.1% | Canada |
| 2010s | 39.8% | 0.0% | 39.8% | Canada |
| 2020s | 43.6% | 30.0% | 13.6% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Canada or Congo?
- Congo, at 45.0% against 43.7% in Canada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Canada and Congo?
- 1.3%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Congo rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Canada ranks 91st and Congo ranks 89th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.