Central Asia vs Finland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Central Asia
33.4%
in 2025
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Central Asia rank
13th
Finland rank
12th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Central Asia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 33.4% in Central Asia, a difference of 63.6%.
That makes Finland's figure about 2.9 times Central Asia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 13th and Finland ranks 12th of 21 groups.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 90.3% | 64.7% | Finland |
| 2010s | 29.6% | 96.9% | 67.3% | Finland |
| 2020s | 33.1% | 97.0% | 63.9% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Central Asia or Finland?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 33.4% in Central Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Central Asia and Finland?
- 63.6%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Central Asia and Finland rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Central Asia ranks 13th and Finland ranks 12th of 21 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.