Central Asia vs Liechtenstein: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Central Asia
33.4%
in 2025
Liechtenstein
98.5%
in 2025
Central Asia rank
13th
Liechtenstein rank
10th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Central Asia
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 98.5% against 33.4% in Central Asia, a difference of 65.1%.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 3.0 times Central Asia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 13th and Liechtenstein ranks 10th of 21 groups.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.6% | 98.5% | 72.9% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 29.6% | 98.5% | 68.9% | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 33.1% | 98.5% | 65.4% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Central Asia or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 98.5% against 33.4% in Central Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Central Asia and Liechtenstein?
- 65.1%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Liechtenstein?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Central Asia and Liechtenstein rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Central Asia ranks 13th and Liechtenstein ranks 10th of 21 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.