Chad vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Chad
50.0%
in 2025
Timor-Leste
50.8%
in 2025
Chad rank
94th
Timor-Leste rank
91st
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Chad
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 50.8% against 50.0% in Chad, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 94th and Timor-Leste ranks 91st of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.0% | 21.7% | 28.3% | Chad |
| 2010s | 50.0% | 47.6% | 2.4% | Chad |
| 2020s | 50.0% | 50.8% | 0.8% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Chad or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 50.8% against 50.0% in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Chad and Timor-Leste?
- 0.8%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Timor-Leste?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Timor-Leste rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Chad ranks 94th and Timor-Leste ranks 91st of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.