Chile vs Congo: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Chile
44.2%
in 2025
Congo
45.0%
in 2025
Chile rank
90th
Congo rank
89th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Chile
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 45.0% against 44.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 90th and Congo ranks 89th of 163 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 0.0% | 34.0% | Chile |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 0.0% | 39.3% | Chile |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 30.0% | 12.9% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Chile or Congo?
- Congo, at 45.0% against 44.2% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Chile and Congo?
- 0.8%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Congo rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Chile ranks 90th and Congo ranks 89th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.