Chile vs Philippines: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Chile
44.2%
in 2025
Philippines
43.3%
in 2025
Chile rank
92nd
Philippines rank
94th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Chile
- Philippines
How they compare
Chile currently reports 44.2% against 43.3% in Philippines, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 92nd and Philippines ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 17.9% | 16.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 27.4% | 11.9% | Chile |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 43.3% | 0.4% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Chile or Philippines?
- Chile, at 44.2% against 43.3% in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Chile and Philippines?
- 0.9%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Chile ranks 92nd and Philippines ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.