China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs French Southern Territories: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
57.0%
in 2025
French Southern Territories
100.0%
in 2025
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
3rd
French Southern Territories rank
1st

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • French Southern Territories
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

French Southern Territories currently reports 100.0% against 57.0% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 43.0%.

That makes French Southern Territories's figure about 1.8 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ahead.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 3rd and French Southern Territories ranks 1st of 23 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region averaged higher in 1 and French Southern Territories in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region French Southern Territories Difference Ahead
2000s 57.0% 40.0% 17.0% China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
2010s 57.0% 100.0% 43.0% French Southern Territories
2020s 57.0% 100.0% 43.0% French Southern Territories

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or French Southern Territories?
French Southern Territories, at 100.0% against 57.0% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and French Southern Territories?
43.0%, with French Southern Territories ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and French Southern Territories?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and French Southern Territories rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 3rd and French Southern Territories ranks 1st of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs French Southern Territories: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/french-southern-territories/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/french-southern-territories/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs French Southern Territories: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed