China vs Jordan: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
China
12.2%
in 2025
Jordan
11.6%
in 2025
China rank
144th
Jordan rank
145th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- China
- Jordan
How they compare
China currently reports 12.2% against 11.6% in Jordan, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
China ranks 144th and Jordan ranks 145th of 167 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.2% | 6.5% | 0.7% | China |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 10.9% | 0.2% | China |
| 2020s | 12.1% | 11.6% | 0.5% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, China or Jordan?
- China, at 12.2% against 11.6% in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between China and Jordan?
- 0.6%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jordan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do China and Jordan rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- China ranks 144th and Jordan ranks 145th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.