China vs Liberia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
China
12.2%
in 2025
Liberia
13.2%
in 2025
China rank
144th
Liberia rank
142nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- China
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 13.2% against 12.2% in China, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 144th and Liberia ranks 142nd of 167 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.2% | 9.3% | 2.0% | Liberia |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 13.2% | 2.1% | Liberia |
| 2020s | 12.1% | 13.2% | 1.1% | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, China or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 13.2% against 12.2% in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between China and Liberia?
- 1.0%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Liberia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do China and Liberia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- China ranks 144th and Liberia ranks 142nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.