Congo vs Philippines: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Congo
45.0%
in 2025
Philippines
43.3%
in 2025
Congo rank
89th
Philippines rank
92nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Congo
- Philippines
How they compare
Congo currently reports 45.0% against 43.3% in Philippines, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Philippines ahead.
Congo ranks 89th and Philippines ranks 92nd of 163 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 17.9% | 17.9% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 27.4% | 27.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 43.3% | 13.3% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Congo or Philippines?
- Congo, at 45.0% against 43.3% in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Congo and Philippines?
- 1.7%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Philippines rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Congo ranks 89th and Philippines ranks 92nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.