Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Congo
45.0%
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
45.1%
in 2025
Congo rank
105th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
104th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Congo
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 45.1% against 45.0% in Congo, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 105th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 195 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 42.9% | 42.9% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 45.1% | 45.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 45.1% | 15.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Congo or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 45.1% against 45.0% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Congo ranks 105th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.