Czechia vs Finland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Czechia
97.7%
in 2025
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Czechia rank
11th
Finland rank
12th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 97.7% against 97.0% in Finland, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Finland ahead.
Czechia ranks 11th and Finland ranks 12th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.0% | 90.3% | 16.4% | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.6% | 96.9% | 0.3% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.7% | 97.0% | 0.8% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 97.7% against 97.0% in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Czechia and Finland?
- 0.7%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Czechia ranks 11th and Finland ranks 12th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.