Czechia vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Czechia
97.7%
in 2025
Small island developing states (SIDS)
27.6%
in 2025
Czechia rank
11th
Small island developing states (SIDS) rank
13th

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Czechia
  • Small island developing states (SIDS)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 97.7% against 27.6% in Small island developing states (SIDS), a difference of 70.1%.

That makes Czechia's figure about 3.5 times Small island developing states (SIDS)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 11th and Small island developing states (SIDS) ranks 13th of 167 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Small island developing states (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2000s 74.0% 16.6% 57.4% Czechia
2010s 96.6% 26.1% 70.6% Czechia
2020s 97.7% 27.5% 70.2% Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Czechia or Small island developing states (SIDS)?
Czechia, at 97.7% against 27.6% in Small island developing states (SIDS) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Czechia and Small island developing states (SIDS)?
70.1%, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Small island developing states (SIDS)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Small island developing states (SIDS) rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Czechia ranks 11th and Small island developing states (SIDS) ranks 13th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/czechia/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/czechia/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Czechia vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
206 places, 5,356 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed