Dominican Republic vs Namibia: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Dominican Republic
85.5%
in 2025
Namibia
83.9%
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
25th
Namibia rank
26th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Dominican Republic
- Namibia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 85.5% against 83.9% in Namibia, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 26th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.0% | 57.4% | 5.3% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 85.5% | 82.8% | 2.7% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 85.5% | 83.9% | 1.6% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Dominican Republic or Namibia?
- Dominican Republic, at 85.5% against 83.9% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Dominican Republic and Namibia?
- 1.6%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Dominican Republic ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 26th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.