Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Dominican Republic
85.5%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Dominican Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.5% against 85.5% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.0% | 85.9% | 33.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 85.5% | 87.5% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 85.5% | 87.5% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Dominican Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.5% against 85.5% in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 2.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Dominican Republic ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.