Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Finland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
34.5%
in 2025
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia rank
11th
Finland rank
12th

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
  • Finland
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Finland currently reports 97.0% against 34.5% in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, a difference of 62.5%.

That makes Finland's figure about 2.8 times Eastern and South-Eastern Asia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 11th and Finland ranks 12th of 23 groups.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and South-Eastern Asia Finland Difference Ahead
2000s 22.8% 90.3% 67.6% Finland
2010s 30.0% 96.9% 66.9% Finland
2020s 34.3% 97.0% 62.7% Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia or Finland?
Finland, at 97.0% against 34.5% in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Finland?
62.5%, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Finland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and Finland rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 11th and Finland ranks 12th of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Finland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/finland/">Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs Finland: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed