Eastern Asia vs Réunion: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
Eastern Asia
22.9%
in 2025
Réunion
91.7%
in 2025
Eastern Asia rank
18th
Réunion rank
15th
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- Eastern Asia
- Réunion
How they compare
Réunion currently reports 91.7% against 22.9% in Eastern Asia, a difference of 68.8%.
That makes Réunion's figure about 4.0 times Eastern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eastern Asia ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 18th and Réunion ranks 15th of 21 groups.
Réunion has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 29.9% | 14.7% | Réunion |
| 2010s | 19.9% | 91.7% | 71.8% | Réunion |
| 2020s | 22.5% | 91.7% | 69.2% | Réunion |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Eastern Asia or Réunion?
- Réunion, at 91.7% against 22.9% in Eastern Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Eastern Asia and Réunion?
- 68.8%, with Réunion ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Réunion?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Asia and Réunion rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- Eastern Asia ranks 18th and Réunion ranks 15th of 21 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.