El Salvador vs Eswatini: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered
El Salvador
22.4%
in 2025
Eswatini
22.7%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
155th
Eswatini rank
153rd
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time
- El Salvador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 22.7% against 22.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
El Salvador ranks 155th and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.9% | 20.9% | 14.0% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 22.1% | 21.1% | 1.1% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 22.4% | 22.7% | 0.2% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, El Salvador or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 22.7% against 22.4% in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between El Salvador and Eswatini?
- 0.3%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Eswatini rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
- El Salvador ranks 155th and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.