Equatorial Guinea vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Equatorial Guinea
100.0%
in 2025
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
100.0%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
4th
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
1st

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Heard Island and McDonald Islands currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Heard Island and McDonald Islands has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st of 195 countries.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Heard Island and McDonald Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Heard Island and McDonald Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Equatorial Guinea or Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
Heard Island and McDonald Islands, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Equatorial Guinea and Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
0.0%, with Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/equatorial-guinea/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/equatorial-guinea/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/">Equatorial Guinea vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed