Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered

Equatorial Guinea
100.0%
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
43.2%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
4th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
7th

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 100.0% against 43.2% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 56.8%.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 195 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 32.7% 67.3% Equatorial Guinea
2010s 100.0% 39.7% 60.3% Equatorial Guinea
2020s 100.0% 43.1% 56.9% Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered, Equatorial Guinea or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Equatorial Guinea, at 100.0% against 43.2% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered between Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa?
56.8%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for average proportion of mountain key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/equatorial-guinea/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-mountain-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/equatorial-guinea/sub-saharan-africa/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
218 places, 5,668 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed